Since 1992 the Innocence Project, an American legal charity, has used DNA evidence to help exonerate 271 people who were wrongly convicted of crimes, sometimes after they had served dozens of years in prison. But a mystery has emerged from the case reports. Despite being innocent, around a quarter of these people had confessed or pleaded guilty to the offences of which they were accused.

People have a strange and worrying tendency to admit to things they have not, in fact, done. Researchers aim to find out why. (via theeconomist)

(via theeconomist)


Notes

  1. mypalebluestar reblogged this from catsinbagbagsinriver
  2. herbert-sherbert reblogged this from pinwheeling
  3. caked-cloud9 reblogged this from aliterofsummit
  4. awesomeocelot reblogged this from theeconomist
  5. femmenoire reblogged this from anindiscriminatecollection
  6. anindiscriminatecollection reblogged this from theeconomist
  7. deadintheroses reblogged this from criminalprofiler
  8. mommyfearest reblogged this from criminalprofiler
  9. makemesorry reblogged this from criminalprofiler
  10. criminalprofiler reblogged this from id-by-dna
  11. id-by-dna reblogged this from theeconomist
  12. justonemorecupoftea reblogged this from theeconomist
  13. blackholekitty reblogged this from theeconomist
  14. throw-off-the-bowlines reblogged this from theeconomist
  15. kylekoch reblogged this from theeconomist
  16. timothyleary reblogged this from ecocides
  17. michelle-loves-hj reblogged this from theeconomist
  18. growing-up-indie reblogged this from markcoatney
  19. crocodileblackpelvis reblogged this from theeconomist
  20. alightonyourface reblogged this from villaintine
  21. trevorloy reblogged this from theeconomist
  22. kaikid reblogged this from theeconomist
  23. heisenburger reblogged this from arbitrarily
  24. sumanamonomnom reblogged this from theeconomist
  25. vivian-h reblogged this from theeconomist
  26. netovargas reblogged this from itsherfactory